WHY PAYBACK IS NOT THE BEST METRIC FOR INVESTMENT DECISIONS
Payback is a weak metric for deciding whether to install a solar PV system. It is, however, widely used by solar salespeople to promote their products. It is also used loosely by detractors of the solar revolution to make the exaggerated claim that it would take a homeowner 25, 50 or even 100 years to recover the cost of a solar PV system. Neither is focusing on the real issues, and both are distorting the facts to make their points.
One positive aspect of payback is that it does provide some general sense of risk. The longer it takes to recover an investment, the riskier that investment. That is why banks pay more interest on longer-term certificates of deposit (CDs) and the government usually pays more interest on 30-year bonds than 6-month T-Bills.
Many potential buyers of a solar PV system are uneasy about parting with a large sum of money when the liquidity of the investment is tied to that of the home. What if they need the money before the system pays for itself? What if a better investment comes along and their money is tied up? What about inflation or deflation? These are legitimate questions about any long-term investment and are reasons why most people instinctively like to invest short-term. However, with short-term rates currently close to zero, some investors are willing to risk going to longer maturities.
One way to ease the pain of separation from your money is to finance the system. By borrowing part or all of the costs, you eliminate or lessen the amount of upfront money. As you pay back the loan, you are building equity, most of which is paid for by lower utility bills. The internal rate of return (IRR) will actually be be higher in later holding periods because of the leverage gained from the small amount of equity in the earlier years. Of course, this strategy does increase the risk.
Given that solar PV, like your home, is a long-term investment, what is the usefulness of the payback period? As stated above, it does provide some measure of risk, but it does not permit easy comparison to other investments, particularly those with differing maturities. Also, it does not take into account the returns after payback occurs or the increase or decrease in the system's resale value. For this you need the IRR.
The Solar Investment Model (SIM) provides the IRRs for 30 holding periods, but it also provides the payback and discounted payback periods. For a comprehensive analysis of investment worth and risk, you need to consider the IRR along with the payback metric. To learn more, click Case studies and Model Inputs.